
Saturday, June 18, 2011
Cut-Up to Short-Circuit Control

Moving With The Times





That caption below the piece reads, "Moving with the times."
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Bond's Casino







Luckily some of that series was documented, including the June 9th show which was recorded in full for radio broadcast. On the 30th anniversary of the Bond's show this month, the music still sounds every bit as vital.
For more information on the Clash's stay at Bond's check out this great resource for period articles or read what Jonathan Lethem has to say about the boys here. A couple news reports and live footage of the shows after the jump.
Saturday, June 11, 2011
Thursday, June 09, 2011
Cultural Experience, Via Styrofoam Plates
Friday, May 20, 2011
Welcome to Beautiful Cannes

Friday, April 29, 2011
Devil
John Erick Dowdle | 2010 | 80 min | US
There was a time when an M. Night Shyamalan credit on a film was not a liability. No, really. I don't blame you for not remembering. It was quite a while ago. When Shyamalan's name appeared on screen during the trailers for Devil, however, audiences laughed and jeered loudly in theatres everywhere. Ouch.
It's a shame that his name is the reason so many people avoided Devil because this is exactly the kind of fun genre film that made him a golden boy in the first place. And of course, Shyamalan is only credited with the story. Poughkeepsie Tapes director John Erick Dowdle takes the reigns while veteran genre TV writer Brian Nelson handled the screenplay.
Devil is higher than high concept: five people are trapped in an elevator and one of them is the devil. Trouble afoot! Dumb, obviously, but stylish and fun, as well. The performances are solid, if none of them remarkable, and the movie benefits by clocking in at a brisk 80 minutes. Just right for this kind of one act supernatural thriller. Brian Nelson also wrote the screenplay for Hard Candy, so that gives you an idea of his skill in crafting and shifting a story with few characters in a small space and a single-sentence set-up.
It is not the calibre of The Poughkeepsie Tapes and doesn't pack anywhere near the same punch, but it is the kind of drive-in movie I expect Dowdle to keep making from now on to avoid being strung up in public. Devil may have lost some points at it's initial release because it isn't really of the scale or calibre to deserve a theatrical run. It's more like a "very special episode" of the Twilight Zone. Not necessarily what one is looking for when they shell out fifteen dollars for a ticket, though it would be a pleasant surprise to find when you're battling insomnia and watching Showcase at one AM. That sounds like the opposite of a recommendation, but I swear i enjoyed Devil.

It's a shame that his name is the reason so many people avoided Devil because this is exactly the kind of fun genre film that made him a golden boy in the first place. And of course, Shyamalan is only credited with the story. Poughkeepsie Tapes director John Erick Dowdle takes the reigns while veteran genre TV writer Brian Nelson handled the screenplay.
Devil is higher than high concept: five people are trapped in an elevator and one of them is the devil. Trouble afoot! Dumb, obviously, but stylish and fun, as well. The performances are solid, if none of them remarkable, and the movie benefits by clocking in at a brisk 80 minutes. Just right for this kind of one act supernatural thriller. Brian Nelson also wrote the screenplay for Hard Candy, so that gives you an idea of his skill in crafting and shifting a story with few characters in a small space and a single-sentence set-up.
It is not the calibre of The Poughkeepsie Tapes and doesn't pack anywhere near the same punch, but it is the kind of drive-in movie I expect Dowdle to keep making from now on to avoid being strung up in public. Devil may have lost some points at it's initial release because it isn't really of the scale or calibre to deserve a theatrical run. It's more like a "very special episode" of the Twilight Zone. Not necessarily what one is looking for when they shell out fifteen dollars for a ticket, though it would be a pleasant surprise to find when you're battling insomnia and watching Showcase at one AM. That sounds like the opposite of a recommendation, but I swear i enjoyed Devil.
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Stir Crazy
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Love Knife

Friday, March 04, 2011
Defending the Indefensible

These have the potential to be great events. I do, however, wonder why the programmers have adopted the posture that disliking a film can be visceral while any defence of a movie has to be rooted in film theory, as though that is the only legitimate appreciation of film. I call bullshit on that. No one is ever called to explain that they don't like Shopgirl because the syntagmatic and paradigmatic axis aren't in sync. A viewer can simply say, "It's shit," which it is. So why does my enjoyment of Equilibrium have to be backed up by case studies and text books?
Regardless, I am sure the debates will be high spirited and a lot of fun. I just find their packaging of the debates make them sound stiffer than need be.
Tonight's selections are Alien: Resurrection, defended by Norman Wilner and hosted by John Semley, followed by Freddy Got Fingered. No word on the presenters for Freddy. Both are thoroughly awful movies, as far as I'm concerned, so I am curious to hear how anyone can back them up. At least Resurrection is pretty and the Underground's 35mm presentation should look great.
The ambitious series will run once a month through October and include such titles as MacGruber, The Butterfly Effect, Speed Racer, and Equilibrium (which is seriously a personal favourite of mine). All films which are destined to be classics, surely.
Admission is $10 per screening with a portion of the proceeds going to charities chosen by the the evening’s presenters. For schedule and more information check out Toronto Underground Cinema.
Sunday, February 27, 2011
A Serbian Film
Srdjan Spasojevic | 2010 | 104 min | Serbia
Serbian Film is the new Necronomicon among horror dorks. I'm sure more total time has been spent tweeting and talking about the movie in hushed tones than has been spent by people actually viewing it. And like everyone who has flipped through the Necronomicon has learned, you can't believe the hype.
Broke and faded porn star Milos is approached by a mysterious wealthy benefactor who offers him scads of money to star in one more film. He is told the film will straddle the gap between obscenity and high art. Milos won't be be given a script, know the course of action, or meet his co-actors beforehand as part of the director's process and pursuit of stark realism. The finished film is to be delivered to a select, private clientele: aficionados of extreme cinema.
The first two thirds of Serbian Film are honestly chilling as Milos finds himself haplessly stumbling through a Lynch-ian porn feature surrounded by a stern men who appear to be mercenaries holding videocameras. Of course, we know exactly the kind of film Milos is going to find himself in. Imagining the lurid horror that surely takes place during the gaps in the narrative creates a jet-black mood in the earlier portions of the film. The entire uncomfortable experience hinges upon our imagination. So when Serbian Film heads to flashback territory and Milos begins walking the audience through those gaps step by step, the chill quickly dissipates. Lurid imagination is replaced with explicit sex and violence.
Serbian Film's claim to internet fame is that it ultimately leaves not a single act to the imagination. But where does that leave viewers after we strap in to passively witness a cataloguing of evil? Well, not quite bored, but certainly not interested. In fact, after all the build up, the reveals of the final act are predictable and often even cheesy. There are some awful, horrifying visuals, definitely, but when a narrative forces you to picture them an hour in advance, the actions on display simply feel like awkward retreads and the punch is reduced to a pat on the head.
Serbian Film is not as brutal as you've heard, but it is certainly sillier than you would expect. Perhaps it's more like Go Ask Alice than the Necronomicon? Serbian Film is far too brutal to appeal to viewers of regular horror fare and too cliched and clumsy for those who regularly wade into heavier horror. I don't know where this will ultimately sit. Maybe recommend it to your mom if she asks for a good starter snuff-gore movie.

Broke and faded porn star Milos is approached by a mysterious wealthy benefactor who offers him scads of money to star in one more film. He is told the film will straddle the gap between obscenity and high art. Milos won't be be given a script, know the course of action, or meet his co-actors beforehand as part of the director's process and pursuit of stark realism. The finished film is to be delivered to a select, private clientele: aficionados of extreme cinema.
The first two thirds of Serbian Film are honestly chilling as Milos finds himself haplessly stumbling through a Lynch-ian porn feature surrounded by a stern men who appear to be mercenaries holding videocameras. Of course, we know exactly the kind of film Milos is going to find himself in. Imagining the lurid horror that surely takes place during the gaps in the narrative creates a jet-black mood in the earlier portions of the film. The entire uncomfortable experience hinges upon our imagination. So when Serbian Film heads to flashback territory and Milos begins walking the audience through those gaps step by step, the chill quickly dissipates. Lurid imagination is replaced with explicit sex and violence.
Serbian Film's claim to internet fame is that it ultimately leaves not a single act to the imagination. But where does that leave viewers after we strap in to passively witness a cataloguing of evil? Well, not quite bored, but certainly not interested. In fact, after all the build up, the reveals of the final act are predictable and often even cheesy. There are some awful, horrifying visuals, definitely, but when a narrative forces you to picture them an hour in advance, the actions on display simply feel like awkward retreads and the punch is reduced to a pat on the head.
Serbian Film is not as brutal as you've heard, but it is certainly sillier than you would expect. Perhaps it's more like Go Ask Alice than the Necronomicon? Serbian Film is far too brutal to appeal to viewers of regular horror fare and too cliched and clumsy for those who regularly wade into heavier horror. I don't know where this will ultimately sit. Maybe recommend it to your mom if she asks for a good starter snuff-gore movie.
Vigilante
William Lustig | 1983 | 90 min | US
There are many, many films of this era revolving around the topic of "this city has become a cesspool of crime; the legal system cannot protect us; ordinary citizens should start a-killin." Even the tagline for Vigilante is "You're Not Safe Anymore." This may be as close as we will ever come to Whitesploitation cinema.
Eddie Marino (Robert Forster) is a family man and factory worker in New York City. He loves his wife, his young son, his buds, an honest day of labour, and planning for the future. As soon as the talk of vacations with his wife starts, you know they are all doomed. Days later, Eddie's family is destroyed by a gang of thugs after a dispute over a ten dollar tank of gas. Understandable.
Eddie's coworker and friend Nick (Fred Williamson) floats the idea that he has a van, a gun, and a shit-ton of rage, so maybe they can start picking off gang members themselves? But no, Eddie isn't that kind of guy, the system works, et cetera. He trusts the authorities to deal with these career criminals. But when Eddie's court date rolls around, he witnesses a vulgar display of bribery and a suspended sentence for a killer in a bedazzled denim vest. He attacks the judge in a fit of righteous anger. No, Eddie! Luckily, this clears the way for the most interesting portion of the film. While Eddie tries to navigate a short prison prison stint for contempt, Nick and two other coworkers on the outside are climbing their way up the gang hierarchy using bats and dick kicking.
Once he is released from the clink, the boys welcome Nick and his new lust for street justice with open arms. What follows is a judgment-free depiction of serial assault and murder by the "good guys."
It's not best in class, but thanks to the gore-savy direction of William Lustig (of the Maniac and Maniac Cop films) and the yin and yang performances of Williamson and Forster, this is a satisfying offering of the subgenre. Thumbs up, take back the night, and so forth.

Eddie Marino (Robert Forster) is a family man and factory worker in New York City. He loves his wife, his young son, his buds, an honest day of labour, and planning for the future. As soon as the talk of vacations with his wife starts, you know they are all doomed. Days later, Eddie's family is destroyed by a gang of thugs after a dispute over a ten dollar tank of gas. Understandable.
Eddie's coworker and friend Nick (Fred Williamson) floats the idea that he has a van, a gun, and a shit-ton of rage, so maybe they can start picking off gang members themselves? But no, Eddie isn't that kind of guy, the system works, et cetera. He trusts the authorities to deal with these career criminals. But when Eddie's court date rolls around, he witnesses a vulgar display of bribery and a suspended sentence for a killer in a bedazzled denim vest. He attacks the judge in a fit of righteous anger. No, Eddie! Luckily, this clears the way for the most interesting portion of the film. While Eddie tries to navigate a short prison prison stint for contempt, Nick and two other coworkers on the outside are climbing their way up the gang hierarchy using bats and dick kicking.
Once he is released from the clink, the boys welcome Nick and his new lust for street justice with open arms. What follows is a judgment-free depiction of serial assault and murder by the "good guys."
It's not best in class, but thanks to the gore-savy direction of William Lustig (of the Maniac and Maniac Cop films) and the yin and yang performances of Williamson and Forster, this is a satisfying offering of the subgenre. Thumbs up, take back the night, and so forth.
Thursday, February 10, 2011
Tuesday Weld: Queen of the Druids









"During her childhood, Weld exhibited amazing clairvoyant gifts that quickly brought her to the attention of a concealed Druidic network of families, which Turner claims form the current Illuminati leadership. In this arena of behind-the-scenes world politics and ritual magic, Weld became a fast rising prodigy in the Illuminati, and at the youthful age of 15 was chosen as the new queen and high priestess of the Druids. The initiation rite that signalled her ascension into leadership was the plane crash that carried Buddy Holly, Ritchie Valens, and the Big Bopper to their deaths in February of 1958. According to Turner, the plane had been sabotaged by backers of Weld as part of this ritual which signifed her inauguration as Illuminati Queen and High Priestess."The previous passage was excerpted from the article "Tiffany Overtakes Tuesday Weld" by Adam Gorightly and Douglas Hawes from the book Secret and Suppressed II published by Feral House.
The subject of the article, Jeffrey Turner, may be a man more familiar to you as one of the subjects of the documentary I Think We're Alone Now. In that feature Turner is portrayed as an unstable man with little in his life beyond his obsession with former pop star Tiffany.
While concentrating on theories regarding Tuesday Weld's influence in creating the Illuminati conspiracy known as the Summer of Love, the Gorightly and Hawes article also sheds greater light on Jeffrey Turner's supposed relationship with Tiffany, her role combating Weld's role in the Illuminati, and overcoming her own MK-ULTRA programming. Recommended reading! It just made me love Tuesday Weld all the more.
I Think We're Alone Now is now available on Netflix. Watch the trailer after the jump.
Tuesday, February 08, 2011
Things I Need


Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)